Open Access Pub publishes peer-reviewed, free-to-read open-access articles. Showing
articles matching structural factors — open any to read the full text,
or download the PDF or XML.
Jun 2025 DOI 10.14302/issn.2324-7339.jcrhap-25-5559
Gamba PerryCorresponding author
Background HIV status disclosure is a complex process influenced by multiple factors beyond health system support. Understanding these factors is essential for developing comprehensive interventions to promote disclosure and improve HIV prevention and care outcomes. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 10 health facilities offering comprehensive HIV/AIDS care in Mukono district, Uganda. Data was collected from 317 clients through interview-guided questionnaires. Data was entered using EPI data and analyzed using SPSS version 16, including logistic regression to identify factors associated with disclosure. Results Multiple factors influenced HIV status disclosure. Individual factors included knowledge about HIV (OR=2.34, 95% CI: 1.45-3.78), self-efficacy (OR=3.12, 95% CI: 1.87-5.21), and psychological readiness (OR=2.89, 95% CI: 1.76-4.75). Relationship factors included relationship quality (OR=3.56, 95% CI: 2.13-5.94), communication patterns (OR=2.78, 95% CI: 1.65-4.69), and anticipated partner reaction (OR=4.23, 95% CI: 2.54-7.05). Community factors included perceived stigma (OR=0.34, 95% CI: 0.21-0.56), cultural norms (OR=0.45, 95% CI: 0.27-0.75), and religious beliefs (OR=1.87, 95% CI: 1.12-3.14). Structural factors included economic dependence (OR=0.38, 95% CI: 0.23-0.63) and access to support services (OR=2.45, 95% CI: 1.47-4.08). Conclusions HIV status disclosure is influenced by a complex interplay of individual, relationship, community, and structural factors. Effective interventions to promote disclosure must address these multiple levels of influence, going beyond health system support to create enabling environments for disclosure at the individual, relationship, community, and structural levels.
Sep 2024 DOI 10.14302/issn.2577-137X.ji-24-5207
Olutola AyodotunCorresponding author
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy has emerged as a major challenge to global efforts to control the pandemic, particularly in Nigeria, where hesitancy to other effective vaccines such as polio and measles has been widely reported. Several individual, societal, and structural factors contribute to this behaviour and prevent the effectiveness of COVID-19 prevention efforts. Objectives This study sought to identify the predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the seven states of North-Central, Nigeria. Methods A population-based cross-sectional online survey was conducted among residents using a semi-structured questionnaire adapted from the WHO SAGE vaccine hesitancy scale and distributed via social media networks over 8-weeks. Results A total of 1,429 responses met the inclusion criteria and were analysed. Among the respondents, 60.7% were males, 47.5% were between the ages of 26 and 45, and 80.1% had postsecondary education. A total of 421 respondents (29.5%) were hesitant and unwilling to receive the vaccine. The reasons for hesitancy were concerns about side effects (37.1%), doubt about the existence of COVID-19 (11.0%), and the perception of time required to receive the vaccine (9.6%). Post-secondary education (AOR: 0.49, 0.36-0.66) and people of the Islamic faith (AOR: 0.68, 0.52-0.90) were found to be associated with lower levels of hesitancy. Conclusion The study found that vaccine hesitancy is a complex problem that is linked with multiple social determinants of health as lower educational attainment, lower income and Christian faith were found to be predictors of vaccine hesitancy. Confidence, Complacency and Convenience factors were expressed by respondents as concerns about side effects, doubt about the existence of COVID-19 and time required to receive the vaccines were the most prominent reasons for unwillingness to receive the vaccine. In order to protect the public health of communities, targeted interventions are required to increase vaccine acceptance by cultivating trust in vaccines, disseminating accurate information, and engaging with community stakeholders including religious groups.
Jun 2017 DOI 10.14302/issn.3070-5835.jcpn-17-1580
Ronit Calderon-MargalitCorresponding author
Objective. To describe the attitudes and behavior of registered nurses in their professional interaction toward unlicensed assistive personnel (UAPs) and to identify areas to develop policy for an effective nursing development and workforce planning. Background: One of the challenges health care systems have been addressing is the integration of the UAPs into the nursing care delivery systems. Study Design: Aphenomenological study involving registered nurses, staff and managerial positions. Data were collected using an in-depth semi-structured interview. Findings: Nurses report an increased task management workload which may lead to a decline in the quality of nursing care. Structural factors that are related to nurses and to UAPs were mentioned as affecting the quality of their professional and collaborative interaction. Conclusions: Training nurses to work with UAPs while developing their communication and managerial skills may improve the quality of care and increase their level of satisfaction.