Journal of Neurological Research and Therapy

Submit Manuscript
Editorial policies

Editorial Policies

Journal of Neurological Research and Therapy · ISSN 2470-5020

The policies that govern peer review, research ethics, publication integrity, authorship, data, corrections and licensing at JNRT.

Our commitment

Editorial standards

The Journal of Neurological Research and Therapy follows the publication-ethics guidance of COPE and applies the same standards to every manuscript, whatever its source. Editorial decisions are based on scope, scientific quality, methodological rigor, ethical compliance, reporting quality, and relevance to the journal. Editorial decisions are independent of the article processing charge (USD 2,100), which is payable only after acceptance; withdrawal after submission is subject to the journal's withdrawal policy.

Peer review & editorial process

How a manuscript moves from submission to decision

Step 1

Editorial screening

An editor first checks each submission for scope, ethics and basic methodological soundness before it is sent for review. Basic and experimental studies need no immediate clinical application, provided they address a clear neuroscience or neurological question.

Step 2

Independent peer review

Single-blind by default; double-blind review is available on request. Manuscripts that proceed to external peer review are normally evaluated by at least two independent subject-matter experts.

Step 3

Editorial decision

The handling editor weighs the reviewers' reports and makes the decision.

Editorial decisions are based on scope, scientific quality, methodological rigor, ethical compliance, reporting quality, and relevance to the journal, and are independent of the article processing charge. See the full instructions for authors for what to prepare.

The policy set

Journal policies

From peer review to retractions, each area is governed by a clear, COPE-aligned policy.

Peer review & editorial process

Single-blind by default; double-blind review is available on request. All submissions undergo initial editorial screening. Manuscripts that meet the journal's scope and minimum requirements proceed to independent peer review. Manuscripts that proceed to external peer review are normally evaluated by at least two independent subject-matter experts. Final decisions are made by the handling editor, informed by the reviewers' reports.

Publication ethics & integrity

COPE-aligned throughout. Every submission is screened for textual similarity, with zero tolerance for plagiarism, fabrication and falsification.

Research involving human participants

Studies involving people require approval from an appropriate research ethics committee or institutional review board, with the approval number stated in the manuscript, and informed consent, or a waiver documented by the ethics committee, where applicable; case reports require written consent for publication. Interventional clinical trials must be registered in an accepted public trial registry at or before the first participant provides consent for enrollment. The registry name, registration number, and registration date must be reported in the manuscript.

Research involving animals

Studies involving animals require prior approval from the relevant institutional animal care and use committee or animal ethics committee; the committee name and approval reference number must be stated in the manuscript. Animal work must comply with applicable national and institutional animal-welfare regulations, apply the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement), and be reported in line with the ARRIVE guidelines.

Authorship & CRediT

All listed authors approve the final manuscript and meet recognized authorship criteria. Contributions are described using the CRediT taxonomy, and funding and any medical-writing or editorial assistance must be acknowledged.

Use of AI tools

In line with COPE and ICMJE, generative-AI and large-language-model tools cannot be listed as authors and cannot be cited as a source. Authors must disclose any use of AI in writing or in producing data, figures or analyses, stating the tool and how it was used, and remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality and integrity of their work.

Conflicts of interest

Authors, editors and reviewers disclose competing interests, financial or otherwise. Editors and reviewers with a conflict of interest are recused before assignment, and relevant disclosures are published with the article.

Plagiarism screening

Every manuscript is checked for textual similarity against the published literature before review. Overlap, including with an author's own prior work, is assessed and resolved under COPE guidance.

Data availability & self-archiving

Every empirical research manuscript must include a data-availability statement. Sharing of underlying data is encouraged where ethics and consent allow. Because every article is CC BY 4.0, authors may archive the published version in any repository, immediately and with no embargo.

Corrections & retractions

We publish transparent corrections, retractions and expressions of concern following COPE flowcharts when the record needs to be put right. These notices stay on the permanent record. Correcting and, where necessary, retracting work is a normal part of research integrity.

Appeals & complaints

Authors may appeal with a clear, evidence-based rationale, reviewed by a senior editor not involved in the original decision. Complaints about process or conduct are handled confidentially with documented outcomes.

Manuscript withdrawal

Requests to withdraw a submitted manuscript are handled under the manuscript withdrawal policy on the article processing charges page.

Digital preservation

This journal’s content is committed to Portico, a not-for-profit digital-preservation archive run by ITHAKA (the organization behind JSTOR). As articles are deposited they enter Portico’s permanent archive, so the scholarly record stays available for the long term — even if a title one day ceases to publish. Read our preservation policy.

Integrity, in practice

What these policies protect

Research integrity

Textual-similarity screening and zero tolerance for plagiarism, fabrication and falsification.

Conflicts, appeals and complaints

Competing interests declared, with conflicted editors and reviewers recused, appeals reviewed by an uninvolved senior editor, and complaints handled confidentially.

Accountable authorship

All authors approve the final manuscript, contributions are described with CRediT, and funding and writing help are acknowledged.

Correcting the record

Transparent corrections, retractions and expressions of concern, kept on the permanent record, with authors supplying underlying data on request.

Open, citable science

CC BY 4.0 with authors retaining copyright, immediate open access and a permanent Crossref DOI on every article.

Long-term preservation

Journal content is committed to Portico, a not-for-profit digital-preservation archive, for long-term access to the scholarly record.

Read next

The pages these policies connect to

Instructions for Authors

Article types, formatting, reporting standards and the ManuscriptZone submission path.

Instructions for Authors →

Aims and Scope

What we publish: basic, clinical, applied, experimental and translational research in neuroscience and neurology, with a scope check.

Aims and Scope →

Editorial board

The subject-expert editors in neuroscience and neurology who apply these policies to each manuscript.

Editorial board →

Article processing charge

The article processing charge (USD 2,100), what it covers, and the manuscript withdrawal policy.

Article processing charge →

About the journal

Who we are, the field we serve, and how to reach the editorial office.

About JNRT →

Editorial office

Questions about a policy, an appeal or a correction can be sent to the editorial office.

Email the editorial office →
Policy questions

Frequently asked questions

Does open access change editorial decisions?
No. Editorial decisions are based on scope, scientific quality, methodological rigor, ethical compliance, reporting quality, and relevance to the journal. Decisions are independent of the article processing charge, which is payable only after acceptance; withdrawal after submission is subject to the journal's withdrawal policy. There is no fee to submit or to be reviewed.
Is peer review single- or double-blind?
Single-blind by default; double-blind review is available on request. Manuscripts that proceed to external peer review are normally evaluated by at least two independent subject-matter experts. Authors who prefer their identity to be withheld from reviewers can request double-blind review at submission.
Who makes the final decision?
The handling editor makes the decision to accept, request revision or reject, informed by the reviewers' reports. Editors with a conflict of interest are recused from the manuscript.
How are conflicts of interest handled?
Authors, editors and reviewers all disclose competing interests. Any reviewer or editor with a conflict is recused before assignment, so that manuscripts are not assessed by anyone with a competing interest.
What approvals are required for animal studies?
Prior approval from the relevant institutional animal care and use committee or animal ethics committee, stated in the manuscript with the committee name and approval reference number; compliance with applicable national and institutional animal-welfare regulations and the 3Rs; and reporting in line with the ARRIVE guidelines.
What is your policy on AI and large-language-model tools?
Following COPE and ICMJE guidance, generative-AI and large-language-model tools cannot be listed as authors and cannot be cited as a source. If you use AI to help write your manuscript or to produce data, figures or analyses, you must disclose the tool and how it was used, and you remain fully responsible for the accuracy and integrity of the work.
How do you screen for plagiarism?
Every submission is screened for textual similarity before it enters review. Overlap with the existing literature, including the author's own prior work, is assessed against COPE guidance.
Can I deposit my article in a repository?
Yes. Because every article is published under CC BY 4.0, you may deposit the published version in any repository, institutional, subject or preprint, immediately and with no embargo, which helps satisfy funder open-access mandates.
Can I appeal a decision?
Yes. Submit a clear, evidence-based rationale to the editorial office. The appeal is reviewed by a senior editor who was not involved in the original decision.
Are corrections and retractions published?
Yes. We publish transparent corrections, retractions and expressions of concern when they are needed to protect the integrity of the published record, following COPE guidance. These notices remain part of the permanent record.
Who keeps copyright, and how is the work licensed?
Authors retain copyright. Every article is published immediately open access under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, each with a permanent Crossref DOI.

Submitting to JNRT

Read the Instructions for Authors before preparing your manuscript, then submit through ManuscriptZone.

Menu